Praising Political Violence

Illustration of a speaker holding a microphone as another man shouts and raises a fist.

Written by

in

Originally published September 13, 2025, in Palm Beach Independent.

Editorial

After the Assassination of Charlie Kirk (Sept. 10–13, 2025)

Consequences of advocating for, and celebrating political violence. This moral decline damages civil discourse and threatens democracy.

Archive note: This editorial preserves the original reporting and statuses as of September 13, 2025. References to pending action and planned follow-up belong to the original publication.

Overview

On September 10, 2025, conservative spokesman Charlie Kirk was assassinated during a peaceful speaking event at Utah Valley University. A 22-year-old suspect was taken into custody within ~36 hours. In the immediate aftermath, some public figures and employees began broadcasting and posting messages celebrating or justifying the murder. Employers across many sectors responded by suspending, firing, or otherwise taking disciplinary action.

The Rising Tide of Immorality

The left’s Cancel Culture movement has been targeting virtually every inherent aspect of Western Culture—including its various forms of Christianity, especially teachings on morality and ‘love thy enemy.’ The net effect of this moral erosion is evident in the trend encouraging and praising violence. This dehumanizes groups and individuals, normalizes violent behavior, and erodes the Western norms designed to keep disagreements civilized and nonviolent.

The advent of social media and leftwing radical cable TV programs are amplifying impulsive behavior, violence, hateful speech, and ultimately expelling civil discourse from Western Culture.

Free speech in the United States is protected by the Constitution, in the First Amendment, it protects citizens from government persecution. This right and its protections however do not prevent at-will employers from restricting speech they believe is harmful to their business, violates professional codes of conduct, or erodes public trust. Hence, there are workplace consequences.

Workplace Consequences (Recent Examples)

U.S. Secret Service employee (Anthony Pough)

Celebrated the assassination of Charlie Kirk posting the reference “karma” and calling Mr. Kirk a racist; Mr. Pough was placed on immediate leave; security clearance reportedly revoked pending investigation.

Source: CBS News

Steve Cody, Councilman (Palmetto Bay, FL)

Called Kirk’s assassination a “fitting sacrifice to our Lords: Smith & Wesson.” Consequences: Public backlash; calls for his resignation from local officials (including Florida AG).

Source: CBS Miami

Source: NBC Miami

John Colgan, Cornelius (OR) city councilor & teacher (Forest Grove SD)

Posted that news of Kirk’s death “brightened up my day,” plus additional inflammatory remarks. Consequence: Resigned council seat; placed on leave from teaching job.

Source: KPTV (FOX 12 Oregon)

Source: Portland Tribune

Nasdaq junior employee

Social posts perceived as supporting/celebrating the killing. Consequence: Terminated under zero‑tolerance policy for condoning violence.

Source: Reuters

Carolina Panthers football communications coordinator (Charlie Rock)

Posted comments mocking Kirk’s death on social media. Consequence: Fired by the team.

Source: PRWeek

Source: Charlotte Observer

Las Vegas sports radio producer (Bobby Machado)

Posted celebratory/hateful remarks about Kirk’s assassination. Consequence: Fired by Lotus Communications (parent of FOX Sports Las Vegas/ESPN).

Source: KTNV (ABC 13 Las Vegas)

Source: FOX5 Vegas

Nigel G. Mann, Professional Engineer at South Florida Water Management District

Posted Facebook comments joking about the assassination. Mr. Mann has 900+ followers. Consequence: Pending. PBI will reach out to SFWMD and the Florida Commission on Ethics for comment. We’ll update this story when we have more.

Screenshot of three Facebook posts attributed to Nigel G. Mann, as reproduced in the September 2025 publication.
Facebook posts attributed to Nigel G. Mann, reproduced from the original September 2025 publication. View the screenshot at full size.

Mark Sivek, incoming Las Vegas Realtors board member

Posted comments on social media regarding the assassination. Consequence: Resigned from incoming board position.

Source: Las Vegas Review‑Journal

Broader, in the News Coverage

Original Publication

Read or download the original publication (PDF, 6 pages).

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *